Part
II Warm Season Vegetables |
|
| |
|
Article |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Evaluating
Suitable Tomato Cultivars for Early Season High Tunnel Production
in the Central Great Plains
by
Lewis
W. Jett and Andrew Read |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Introduction |
|
|
|
|
| |
There
is expanding interest in the use of high tunnels for extended
season tomato production in the central Midwest. High tunnels
(hoop houses) are passive solar greenhouses or cold frames that
are used to extend the traditional growing season for many horticulture
crops. However, there is very little information on tomato cultivar
performance within high tunnels. Growing conditions within a
high tunnel can be significantly different from growing conditions
typically encountered in field production. High tunnels increase
the average 24 h temperature by as much as 15ºF (Jett,
2002). High tunnels also protect a crop from variable weather
and pests and offer the opportunity to control the growing environment
relative to field. The objective of this research was to evaluate
the yield performance of several tomato cultivars within a high
tunnel and in the field.
|
|
| |
| |
Materials
and Methods |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Four
high tunnels (HT) (Stuppy Greenhouse Manufacturing Inc., North
Kansas City, Missouri) were constructed in July 2001 at the
University of Missouri Bradford Research and Education Center
located near Columbia, Missouri (Lat. 38N, Long. 92W). The soil,
a fine Mexico silt loam, montmorillonitic, mesic Mollic Endoaqualf,
was tilled, graded, and leveled prior to construction. Soil
samples were taken prior to planting and analyzed by the University
of Missouri soil-testing laboratory. |
|
|

Lewis
Jett in Columbia Missouri, notice sidewalls are rolled up.
|
|
| |
|
| Soil
pH was 6.0, with approximately 2% organic matter. Each HT was
20’ (width) x 9’ (height) x 36’ (length) providing
approximately 700 square feet of total planting space per house.
Hoops were spaced six feet apart with one top purlin. For ventilation,
a 39” high roll-up sidewall was used which extended the
length of both sides of each high tunnel and was rolled up manually.
Tunnels were built with the long axis oriented east west in
order to intercept the areas prevailing south by southwest wind.
Each tunnel was covered with a single layer of clear 6 mil plastic
(K-50, Klerk’s Plastic Products Manufacturing Inc., Richburg,
South Carolina). Field grown control plots were adjacent to
the high tunnels. Tomato seeds from seven cultivars were seeded
in late January 2002 for high tunnel evaluation and late February
for field evaluations into standard germination trays filled
with Pro-mix BX media (Hummert Intl. St. Louis, Missouri) and
subsequently transplanted into Compack 606 trays (2 ¼”
x 2” cell) at the 2-3 true leaf stage. Transplants were
grown in the greenhouse for approximately 6 weeks and then prepared
for transplanting into the high tunnel on March 24, 2002. One
week prior to transplanting, the tomatoes were hardened off
by exposing them to ambient temperatures for 3-4 hours each
day. |
|
| |
|
| High
Tunnel Evaluations |
|
| The
soil within the high tunnel was tilled, fertilized and ridged
(4” height) prior to application of a 1 mil, embossed
plastic mulch. Tomato plants in all treatments were spaced 24”
(0.6 m) within row with 3’ (0.9 m) between rows resulting
in 6 square feet per plant. |
|

Plants are supported with the string weave
method. |
|
| Plots
were irrigated with at least one inch of water weekly through
8mil t-tape with 12” dripper spacing and a flow rate of
0.450 gpm (TSX-508, T-Systems International, San Diego, California).
A granular 13N -13P -13K fertilizer was applied pre plant to
all plots at the rate of 50-lbs per acre. Calcium nitrate (CaNO3)
was applied weekly through the drip irrigation at a rate of
10 lbs per acre (1 g/m²) commencing two weeks after transplanting
using a Dosatron fertilizer injector (40 gal per min) and continuing
through harvest. Tomatoes were supported using the string weave
method, with two tomato plants between each stake. |
|
Tomato
cultivars evaluated were ‘Florida 47’, ‘Florida
91’, ‘Floralina’, ‘Merced’, ‘Carolina
Gold’, ‘Brandywine’, ‘BHN 543’,
and ‘Mt. Fresh’. ‘Florida 47’ is a vigorous
determinate that ripens mid-season with very large fruit.
‘Floralina’ is a medium tall determinate with large
fruit that ripens early to mid-season. |
|
| ‘Florida
91’ is a medium determinate, heat tolerant, early to mid-season
cultivar with large fruit. |
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
‘Merced’
is an early ripening determinate cultivar with large fruit.
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
‘Carolina
Gold’ is a tall determinate that ripens mid-season with
large, yellow-colored fruit. ‘Brandywine’ is an
heirloom cultivar with an indeterminate growth habit and large
fruits that ripen late in the season. |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
‘BHN
543’ is a medium tall determinate cultivar with large
fruit ripening early to mid-season. |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
‘Mt.
Fresh’ is a tall determinate cultivar with large fruit
that ripens mid-season. |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
There
were four replications for each treatment type arranged in a
completely randomized block design. Plants were transplanted
into rows of sixteen plants, with four plots per row. Each plot
contained 4 plants. Plants were covered with row cover continuously
until the first flowers appeared. During flowering, row covers
were removed in the morning and replaced in the afternoon when
the vents were closed. When the weather began warming, row covers
were only used on evenings when the temperature dropped below
50°F (10°C). Sidewall vents were opened if the prevailing
outside temperature was 60°F. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Field
Evaluations |
|
| |
The
tomato cultivars were transplanted into field plots in late
April 2002. Cultural practices were similar to high tunnel treatments
with the spacing being 2’ between plants and 5 feet between
rows providing 10 square feet per plant.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Results
and Discussion |
|
| |
|
|
| |
In
the central Midwest, there is a strong price premium for early
tomatoes marketed before the first week in July. To document
the level of this premium, we recorded wholesale tomato prices
at the Central Missouri Produce Auction during 2002. The Central
Missouri Produce Auction is a local wholesale outlet for many
commercial vegetable growers in central Missouri. Supplies of
greenhouse (ground culture or hydroponics) tomatoes become available
starting in late April in Missouri. Wholesale prices remained
relatively high through June, and then began to decline in July
as field supplies increased (Figure 1). |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Figure
1. Wholesale tomato prices (US No. 1 Large: 2.5-2.75”
diameter) per box (25 lb.). Source: Central Missouri Produce
Auction, Versailles, MO. Prices and supply to the left of the
line represent “early” prices. |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
High
Tunnel Evaluations |
|
| |
Total
early (i.e., before July 4) marketable yield from ‘BHN
543’, and ‘Merced’ were significantly greater
than all other cultivars evaluated (Table 1). |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Table
1. Early (6/14-7/4) marketable yield of tomato cultivars within
a high tunnel. |
|
| |
Cultivar |
Marketable
Yield (lbs per plant)z |
| |
US
No. 1 |
US
No. 2 |
Total |
| BHN
543 |
3.3a
|
1.2ab
|
4.5a |
| Brandywine |
1.8cd |
1.4a |
3.2b |
| Carolina
Gold |
2.3a |
0.8b |
3.1b |
| Floralina |
1.5d |
1.4a |
2.9b |
| Florida
47 |
1.9cd |
1.1ab |
3.0b |
| Florida
91 |
2.6abc |
0.6b |
3.2b |
| Merced |
3.1ab |
1.6a |
4.7a |
| Mt.
Fresh |
1.9cd |
0.6b |
2.5b |
zMeans
with the same letter are not significantly different LSD P<
or = 0.05. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Early
yield of US No. 1 fruit from ‘BHN 543’, ‘Merced’
and ‘Florida 91’ was significantly greater relative
to the other cultivars evaluated. ‘Brandywine’,
an indeterminate beefsteak cultivar, produced significantly
less marketable fruit and had the highest percentage of unmarketable
fruit. Culls from ‘Brandywine’ were mostly the result
of radial fruit cracking and surface blemishes. ‘Brandywine'
also had internal white tissue from heat stress. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Figure
2. Cumulative marketable yields per plant (6/14-7/20) within
a high tunnel. |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Field
Evaluations |
|
| |
Tomatoes
in field plots were harvested starting on July 25, 2002, and
separated into marketable grade classes (Table 2). |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Table
2. Field performance of tomato cultivars. |
|
| |
Cultivar |
Marketable
Yield (lbs per plant)z |
| |
US
No. 1 |
US
No. 2 |
Total |
| BHN
543 |
6ab
|
1ns |
7ns |
| Brandywine |
4b |
3ns |
7ns |
| Carolina
Gold |
7ab
|
2ns |
9ns |
| Floralina |
8a |
2ns |
10ns |
| Florida
91 |
7ab
|
2ns |
9ns |
| Merced |
4b |
5ns |
9ns |
| Mt.
Spring |
8a |
5ns |
13ns |
| Mt.
Fresh |
9a |
3ns |
12ns |
|
|
| |
zMeans
with the same letter are not significantly different LSD P<
or = 0.05. NS=Not significant. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
‘Merced’,
‘Floralina’, ‘BHN 543’, ‘Florida
91’ and ‘Carolina Gold’ had significantly
higher marketable yields when grown within a high tunnel relative
to the field. In addition, high tunnel tomatoes were more than
30 days earlier than field tomatoes. On an area basis, high
tunnel tomatoes significantly out yielded field tomatoes (Figure
3). |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Figure
3. Comparison of yield per square foot of all tomato cultivars
evaluated. |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Conclusions |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
For
growers interested in early tomato production, high tunnels
seem to be an excellent technology to achieve this goal. Our
research has documented significant yield enhancement from high
tunnel production. Almost every cultivar that performs well
in the field environment will excel in a high tunnel. Disease
infestation and physiological ripening disorders such as yellow
shoulder and sun scorch were negated by the high tunnel. Based
on the results of this research, it is possible for a grower
to have vine-ripe tomatoes from mid-June until October in the
central Midwest by using high tunnels as a complement to field
production. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Acknowledgements |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The
authors thank Rupp Seeds Inc., Wauseon, OH and Chesmore Seed,
St. Joseph, Missouri for providing seed samples for this research.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
About
the Authors |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Lewis
Jett is and Assistant Professor & State Vegetable Crops
Specialist at Department of Horticulture, University of Missouri-Columbia,
Columbia, Missouri 65211-7114. Andrew
Read is a Graduate Research Assistant at
Department of Horticulture, University of Missouri-Columbia.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|